For decades, we said technology would release us secular, but we somehow tied our tables more than us. Now the foundation of the GOTO, finally, the artificial intelligence suggests that we can reach the point where the artificial intelligence is not promised by freedom. But it is not a true revelation, AI offices can be obsolete. This creates conditions for I called the AI, “Cultivated Center” – “Raising-centric work” – the audience prioritizes human development on productivity.
The release of a great job
Numbers are an attractive story: 51% of the employees will prefer to work with an expanded remote AI, which is 62% in the traditional office environment. But here’s the deepening of this slip – it’s other than denying human relationship. Instead, our work and colleagues are due to the return of autonomy to choose where, where and how we are doing.
This is perfectly adapted with the basic principles of my book, To move. Think. Rest. 71% of employees give them more comfort and work-life balance, and explaining the conditions necessary for true cultivation. It is allowed to take the time to take time to think of time, to move naturally throughout the day and rest when they require their bodies and minds.
From production to integration
How to support the full range of human experience in the work, which is particularly surprising about Goto’s research, reveals the potential of the EU to support the full range of human experience. Traditional productivity models demanded us to share ourselves – justify as disobedient brains in the exit. Ari creates a place for integrating advanced work environments.
When employees report, the EU describes the freedom of alignment with natural energy periods when the EU will “work anywhere without losing productivity.” There may be a walk in nature, and can create environmental conditions for thinking through problems during the move and support their best thoughts.
Separates the cultivation
However, research also detects a space on the applications to apply. 91% of IT leaders agree only 53% of remote and hybrid employees, although 91% of companies use the distributed teams. This separation is not only related to technological placement – this is about understanding the difference between the AI use to repeat old productivity models suitable man to support the blossom.
Companies who successfully eliminate this gap are those who do different questions. Instead of “Can AI people make more productive?” “How can AI create people naturally developed?” They ask. Prepare AI applications that support the three-columns of agriculture: movement (comfort to work in different environments), thinking (for deep reflection) and rest (unloading and recharge permission).
Affecting age rejection
One of the most motivating findings challenges assumptions outside the age of technology. Studies show that among all generations – 90% of the remote gen z provides productivity through AI expanded remote work that provides 90% of 94% of baby boomers-people. This offers a deep thing: technology, people from all ages, rather than to adapt to machine rhythms, can benefit.
This generation association is like the force that equates the potential of the EU, not everyone is the same, but to chase different ways of different people, process and contribute.
Probably, most of them are 61% of employees, including in office-convinced organizations, they must prioritize the AI investment on Fancy Workplace conditions. This is not to talk about choosing technology on human experience. This is to accept that it is related to the presence of tools and convenience to do meaningful work in ways that glorify the full humanity of real workers.
The way forward
We have an option as they re-change the AI work. We can use it to create more complex control and productivity production or finally use the promise of a person’s prospering technology. Organizations who choose the last one will find themselves with a deep competitive advantage: more productive, but more productive, more engaging, more engaging and more engaging and more engaging and more interesting and more interesting.
The question will be changed and the AI work. The question is that we use this transformation to create human potential or simply optimizing human speech. Goto research shows that employees are ready to cultivate. The question is: are their leaders?