The continuous cavalry of the AI world ads created a sense of reality. There are so many noises, in the industry, there is almost a lot of money, it is almost self-sacrifice to doubt that the AI will be good for changing the world. Deep studies can make 1% of all knowledge! Developed for internet agents soon! Infinite Ghibli!
And then you remember that it pulls AI screws. All. This. Time.
Hallucinations – a large language model, information from all the gland, was a matter of generative AI since its inception. They are durable to the sharp light: Despite the progress in the size and sophistication, serious mistakes occur in developed thinking or thinking models. Hallucinations appear to be specific to the general technology, which is an additional product of the EU’s appearance magic quality to create new content from fine air. Both a feature and a mistake at the same time.
{Bloctype “:” Creator-Network-Promo “,” Data “:” HTTPS: \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / imago Kopilot ‘: “Want more about the change of EU?
Accuracy in journalism is not optional and the AI stumbles is complete. Just ask BloombergThe AI has already hit turbulence with emerging summaries. Outlet, in January this year, began publishing AI’s bullet points for some news and therefore had to make more than 30 of them New York Times.
Experience not only receiving it
AI is sometimes described as an incredibly productive interns, because it has the ability to create a lot of things and create extraordinary content. But if you had to make adjustments for an internship for three months, you probably say my experience begins to look at a different career path.
Bloomberg The first publication that began hallucinations is difficult. However, the problem of the problem is still for over two years, after Chatgpt debut, the EU determines the initial tension when applied to the media. But because they often mistake the AI, the speech should also be checked with “people in the loop.” You can’t do both.
To date, the typical approach is to shoot a rejection of the contents. Washington PostAsk Post AI, AI is a good example, warning users, features “experience” and users to confirm “users ‘users’ users ‘users’. Many other publications have a similar rejection.
A media company, “You can’t trust it,” a strange world presented a new feature with a label. It is not a second feature of journalism – this is not the whole moment. This contradiction is one of the most strangest manifestations of the AI’s application in the media.
To go into the world “close enough”
How was it? Undoubtedly, media companies were forced to do so. When ChatGPT and other large language models begin to summarize the content, we are often blown up with the languages we are aware of the good print, “We can’t do chatramp.” Check important information. “And this is for the majority of those who are good enough. Although the generative AI is wrong, Chatbots saw explosive users grow.
This is not the standard anyone, but the media is slowly accepted as more publications of generation experiences with similar rejection. “On this” about this, “about it,” about it, “the media companies have a pressure on this” about this, “the media companies feel pressure for licensing transactions to access their content or conversations. Accuracy? There is a rejection for this.
However, a noteworthy grip is but the BBC. To date, BBC has not signed any transactions in connection with the AI and the beginning of this year was the leader in the operation of their research, broadcasting its research in the early years. It was a BBC convincing the news of the news that came to the point of preparing completely false narratives.
In a world that looks increasingly fashionable to receive licensing money from media companies, BBC is a more active approach to an active approach. Many media companies began to say that there are many media companies, no matter if the reality of the fiscal or large technology is a reality distortion of technology. After all, “Today will be the worst this technology,” he said.
Think of pollution and coal plants. It is an ugly side effect but the one that does not stop the business not to develop. How hallucinations operate in the AI: clearly defective, sometimes harmful, still endured – because growth and money continues to come.
However, these fake speeches are fatal in an industry with accurate information. Journalists should not sit back and wait for Silicon valley to solve simply selfishness, and the BBC shows that it is a path to being part of the solution without looking or ignoring the problem. After all, the media of the media “to check important information” is believed.
{Bloctype “:” Creator-Network-Promo “,” Data “:” HTTPS: \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / imago Kopilot ‘: “Want more about the change of EU?